09 Jun
Posted by Cory Perry as Barack Obama, Election 2008, Hillary Clinton
It is really hard to imagine that a candidate with the last name of Clinton would have trouble raising money for a major, national political campaign. However, according to Mark Penn, who was a top adviser for the Clinton campaign, money may have been the primary factor in Hillary Clinton’s loss.
While everyone loves to talk about the message, campaigns are equally about money and organization. Having raised more than $100 million in 2007, the Clinton campaign found itself without adequate money at the beginning of 2008, and without organizations in a lot of states as a result. Given her successes in high-turnout primary elections and defeats in low-turnout caucuses, that simple fact may just have had a lot more to do with who won than anyone imagines.
One of the biggest mistakes that I believe the Clinton campaign made was not organizing enough in the states that they deemed “not critical.” Even right before Super Tuesday, Feb 5th, the Clinton campaign did not even have offices and staff in many states that have now proved to be decisive states in the Obama victory.
I don’t necessarily agree with Penn that money was the cause of the loss, simply because I believe they thought it would truly be over right after Super Tuesday.
I tend to place the blame a little more on the lack of organization, which by the time they realized the mistake, it was too late to rebound from it. Obviously, having great organization in a campaign takes loads of money to do right, but I don’t think it was the money so much as it was the utter avoidance of such organization.
I can see how the Clinton’s may have overlooked the need to build a campaign that would last almost 15 months, as Barack Obama was clearly a major underdog in this race. However, if anybody should know the “anything can happen” mantra, it is the Clinton’s and somewhere in the back of somebody’s mind, that though should have been swimming around.
Ultimately, I think the loss can be attributed to several factors, and money may very well be one of those.
7 Responses
jane-pa puma
June 19th, 2008 at 7:19 pm
1Never to late it aint over yet. I think she will get enough to cover all her debt. So many still have her back and will. Convention will tell the story. I think people will see what a mess we got in and count her the real nominee. We dont vote for selected just elected -Hillary
Cory Perry
June 19th, 2008 at 7:40 pm
2@jane-pa puma:
Are you saying that Obama has caused a mess? Hillary is out, so you might as well deal with that like an adult and move on to support the party.
Or, you can join the other side and continue to tear this country down as they have done for the last 7 years.
jane-pa puma
June 19th, 2008 at 8:02 pm
3may i ask who are you telling me what i must do or not do. I will hold Hillarys back till convention and have every right to do so. I am an adult and have seen this selecting Obama tear this party and countryapart. This was such a travestry and now moveing dnc to Chicago?This is supposed to be OUR party not his. This is why I have so many doubts about this man.He has disallowed questions or comman sence probing to find out who he is. He has sent this country back decades.So Cory dont even try to lecture me or I will have to take you over my knee LOL
Cory Perry
June 19th, 2008 at 8:17 pm
4@jane-pa puma:
So it is a travesty that your candidate lost to a better candidate? I don’t see that as a travesty, I see that as Democracy.
Obama is uniting this party like no other candidate has in recent years. In my honest opinion, it is people like you that are dividing this party by not supporting the party and the chosen candidate. I understand that you may be frustrated because Hillary lost the primary, but the better candidate was chosen for the job, and as a fellow Democrat, I would hope that you would support that candidate based on doing what is right for this country, not what is right for your own personal satisfaction.
I also find it extremely ironic that you would say the first black presidential nominee in history has set this country back decades. Your logic on that is totally off base.
Moving the DNC to Chicago makes no difference. As the nominee, Obama has that right and it is his call. If he feels that it can be operated better and more efficiently by moving it to Chicago, then move it.
Hillary is not going to resurface at the convention, except to support Obama. Her campaign is over.
jane-pa puma
June 19th, 2008 at 8:43 pm
5I notice you have said chosen instead of elected and that is our exact
problem. Cory,The DNC and Obama tried to close down this contest for a long time before it was over. I believe so people wouldnt come out and vote for Hillary but they did and she won big time. and she did it time and time again. At the end Obama was limping to try to get to finish line. She was laughed at by Obama and the media and they all treated her like jerks.She stood her ground and kept winning.
I say Obama put this country back exactly cause he was black and played it like a harp.He lied about Pres and Hillary Clinton being raceist to build his base.They have worked for Blacks and latinos and all people most of there lives. Cory He lies about everything so he cannt be trusted. NAFTA than says og just political talk when he was in Ohio. Just recently the minister of Iraq said he wasnt talking like he does to us.He had a director had to tell oversees people he didnt mean his Iraq talk.
He says he will have people he picks to tell him what to do. Johnson had to step down his first pick. He has quite a group . He has shown us the people he choses are not what I would want to lead us. Rezko, Ayers, Wright, Phleger,Rahidi, Farrakhan, Hammas .We could go on all day. Do you see my point? He isnt the nominee till convention no matter how much he says it. Its the fact jack
Cory Perry
June 19th, 2008 at 9:02 pm
6@jane-pa puma:
Obama needed 2,118 delegates to win the nomination. He got the needed delegates to win the nomination, so I don’t understand your insinuation that this election was somehow unfair. Obama repeatedly said that Clinton was a formidable candidate and should stay in the race as long as she wants to. Obama never tried to shut down anything, nor did the DNC.
Barack Obama NEVER used his race as crutch in the primary. It was the Clintons and their surrogates that tried to inject race into the primary, and they failed. The American people called them on it.
Next, Obama didn’t pick any of the people that you mentioned to be any sort of leaders in his campaign. Again, a totally baseless argument on your part.
As has been said many times before, you are entitled to your own opinion, but you are NOT entitled to your own FACTS. I am done with this argument, as you simply can’t win this one based on your baseless argument.
Thank you for checking out my blog, I appreciate your input.
–Cory
jane-pa puma
June 19th, 2008 at 9:13 pm
7thank you for a forum to debate. Have a good night.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Categories
Recent Posts
Blogs We Read
Campaigns
Political Action
Politivine Network
Other Blog Headlines
Learn More
Archives
Sponsored Links
Recent Entries
Recent Comments
Most Commented
©Copyright 2008, Politivine.com. Contact Politivine.
Maintained by FiveSides Media Development.